I will begin with a parental view of not just these two issues, but all controversial issues in general. Recently my son relayed a story to me about something that had happened at school and in the middle of it all, he said, "gay," in a whisper as if he were afraid that someone would hear him. When he was done, I asked why he had done that and went on to explain that when we whisper words like gay, homosexual, illegal immigrant (because that's a word that gets whispered a lot in my neck of the woods), we perpetuate the stigmas, discrimination, and overall backward thinking that comes along with them. I can honestly say that although my husband and I have open conversations with our son, I am glad that the school takes the initiative to put "it" out there.
"Now we’re told we can talk about race, but it has to be through a multicultural perspective" (Siek, 2012). This, too, will come to an end. A state-wide curriculum in Texas was scrapped over the summer months because a parent got a hold of a high-school social studies lesson in which, in just so happened, the Muslim religion was being discussed as part of a "big picture" lesson. That's all it took for everyone to get riled up, and, as with so many other things, the politicians won. "Our students have already learned so much this year and this process is
teaching them so much more. They are restless, ready to act and eager
for their voices to be heard, and our community is equally supportive to
their desires" (Acosta, 2012). It would be wonderful if the young students directly affected by this can in turn affect some real changes in how they are being edged out of the history of the state they live in. I wonder if being true to student-centered instruction, and allowing these students to "teach" themselves, or learn by way of self-directed investigation/discovery would also end up against the law. Will student research projects also be shut down to fulfill a political agenda?
In terms of curbing bullying all around, our school district has staff development and student presentations either through the counselor or outside agencies and by classroom teachers. Students and parents are asked to sign off on a parent/student responsibility and consequences contract no later than the 2nd week of school. It works for the most part along with reminders throughout the year. Education about tolerance for homosexuality has to begin at home though. I have had students come to school and refer to students that they don't like by calling them "gay" or (Spanish slang) "joto." Neither the speaker nor the target of the slurs are fully aware of what these words mean, but they interpret them to be "bad." As a classroom teacher, I know that I'm not teaching these words to my students, so they and their connotation must be coming from home...Education begins at home. (On a personal note, if parents whose children come to school ready to utter these words were as dedicated about helping with homework and showing up to parent/teacher conferences, we would all be much better off. Students. Teachers. Community.) When these words are spoken, we are somewhat forced to address the issue, and that puts us between a rock and a hard place because we do not have a curriculum for this. What do you say? What do you attempt to make the student understand?
“By the time kids get to high school, it’s too late," says Tess Dufrechou (Eckholm, 2010).
Sorry. Apparently it was the Islamic religion. And you will further have to excuse my ignorance of the difference and/or similarities.
ReplyDeleteThe following link is from April 2013 when the whole CSCOPE stink started. I know it is not specifically Hispanic related, but as a 4th grade teacher, we indoctrinate our students in Texas History. Does not Texas History have Mexico (and thus Hispanic) splattered all over it? How much longer before we have to exclude the discussion of Seguin, Zaragoza and de Zavala?
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=25769804296
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/texas-ethnic-studies-bill-protested-latino-activists_n_2902948.html
I found the following link particularly interesting because as I researched the "CSCOPE" issue, I came across a press release out of State Senator Dan Patrick's office, and, Oh, look...here he is again.
http://nbclatino.com/2013/03/15/texas-state-legislators-seek-to-limit-ethnic-history-in-college-requirements/
Lupita,
ReplyDeleteYou have the distinction of teaching in a state that is notorious for labeling things as "controversial" :)
So, from that perspective, what do you do? How do you go about pushing back against those that would seek to narrow the curriculum? Do you feel like you have the space to do that?
One thing that really made me think was your comment about having kids use words in your class/school that forces your hand to deal with them. What an interesting and compelling way to frame the conversation! Particularly in your situation in a sensitive state, if a kid uses the word "gay" or "joto" in a derogatory manner, the KID is the one that brought up the subject and you, as a responsible adult, was simply trying to deal with the result in the best way possible that protected all of the kids in the room. This, to me, opens up the conversation a little bit.
Do you find that the contract you have students & parents sign is effective? Is it about bullying in a general way or does it talk about specific situations also?
I wonder if, at some point, some of your students might seek to take charge of their curriculum in similar ways to some of the Tucson students? Do students react to some of the legislation going on that mention? Do teachers or parents? What do you think might happen to the curriculum?
Best,
amanda